30px; border: solid 2px #333; color: #000; background-color: yellow; padding: 5px; width: 400px; z-index: 5; font-family: verdana, geneva, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">
    
My blog has moved!
You should be automatically redirected in 5 seconds. If not, visit redirectLink" href='http://blendz72.wordpress.com/'> http://blendz72.wordpress.com and update your bookmarks.

 

Sunday, June 12, 2011

"Is the e.coli terrorism on behalf of corporate farming and food consolidation? With a bonus to the nuclear industry which would make more profits irradiating food and have a use for its "nowhere safe to put them" spent fuel rods. Beyond wondering where the e.coli came from and looking to who gains and who loses from it, serious questions about the proffered "solution" - radiating food - arises, especially after the Fukushima disaster"...

E.coli And Radiation - Surprise! Surprise!
By David Temple
6-11-11

Via:
That European e.coli may have been genetically engineered. But there is no question it is doing what serves the interests of industrial agriculture and the food industry. It has created a rationale ("whether real or promulgated") government officials to come forward on behalf of corporate interests with a "solution" that fresh food be irradiated. And in the words of Gomer Pyle, "Surprise! Surprise!" - they are doing just that.

Henry Kissinger spoke of the advantages to those interested in controlling things "if [people] were told that there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence ..." Twice, he alludes to potential falseness, in the fact of the threat and in the telling about it.

Irradiation of food would consolidate control of food by the corporations and would be the end of fresh and organic and local food.

Is the e.coli terrorism on behalf of corporate farming and food consolidation? With a bonus to the nuclear industry which would make more profits irradiating food and have a use for its "nowhere safe to put them" spent fuel rods.

Beyond wondering where the e.coli came from and looking to who gains and who loses from it, serious questions about the proffered "solution" - radiating food - arises, especially after the Fukushima disaster.

Even logically, why is it that the public is warned that radiation landing on its food is unsafe and that all radiation is cumulative, and yet there is now this suggestion to directly radiate fresh food (expose it intentionally to radiation) and to a degree high enough to actually kill living things in it, yet that radiation is somehow different from the other radiation and perfectly safe, and in addition is somehow supposed to make food safe?

Assuming the radiation kills this super-dread e.coli, what happens to everything else in the food? The radiation can't target only that e.coli, and most of the time, it would not even be present). So what about all the things in food that the radiation would damage or kill (vitamins, for instance) or cause to mutate from its normal state?

Irradiation of food is part of Codex Alimentarius.

Codex was designed by Fritz ter Meer, a Bayer execitove, after he was released from prison for committing mass murder, human enslavement and crimes against humanity.

He was a member of the Managing Board of IG Farben [The Rockefeller had 1/2 interest in IG Farben, were originators of genetic engineering and eugenics and are behind the new US "food safety" law] from its inception to its dissolution. As the Wartime Manager, he was responsible for IG Auschwitz.

In the Nuremberg Tribunal, ter Meer stated: "Forced labor did not inflict any remarkable injury, pain, or suffering on the detainees, particularly since the alternative for these workers would have been death."

In 1948, ter Meer was sentenced by the Nuremberg Tribunal to seven years in prison for plundering and slavery.

In 1952, his sentence was commuted, due to the influence of powerful friends.

From 1956-1964, he was reinstated as a member of the Managing Board of Bayer AG.

In 1962, ter Meer was one of the architects of the "Codex Alimentarius - Commission" and one of the main designers of the schemes that would profit from human suffering.

Codex is meant to remove access to adequate nutrition. It is a brilliant idea - unlimited sickness would be generated for unlimited pharmaceutical industry profit. The pharmaceutical industry is controlled by the Rockefellers and thus is not to be distinguished from the bankers. They are quite literally invested in disease and starvation.

There are movies on the danger to health (and to democracy) posed by Codex, one with Dame Judy Dench.

Strong evidence of harm from radiating food.comes from what recently happened with the Irradiation of cat food in Australia. It had to be halted because of bizarre neurologic harm to cats. For any who begin to say, "But that is just cats ... ," they might be reminded that cats are chosen for university studies specifically because of the similarities between the neurological system of the cat and humans. Seeing the neurological impact of radiating cat food (with constituents the same as human food) might be useful and there is video.

It appears that with just one little e.coli, The Idiot Cycle just sped up. For that cycle describes how those corporations making us sick with their GMOs, pesticides, chemicals, etc. then make money treating the diseases they are causing. And this e.coli was either genetically engineered intentionally by the pharmaceutical industry or, far less likely, the statistically stunning consequence of pharmaceutically dependent farming operations but in either case, from the corporations. Now, not on top of illnesses derived from their food with antibiotics, hormones, slaughterhouse waste, GMOs and pesticides in it, the corporations suggest radiating fresh food, including from organic farms. The contaminated food would add radiation to their list of dangers, and the clean food would be killed. There would be no unprocessed, normal food in the country.

There has been massive media hubbub over the e.coli. But their silences are more significant. No word on whether the e.coli might have been bio-engineered, with pharma having the skills and requisite classes of antibiotics. There was great noise about the dozens of deaths from e.coli but an odd silence about the 100,000 people a year who die routinely from properly prescribed and FDA-approved prescription drugs, so media offers no context to put those deaths in proportion.

And the media is perpetuating the medical coverup of the century, a story that involves 20-50 million deaths but does not benefit the pharmaceutical industry: neither flu nor virus was the cause of the millions of 1918 deaths.

One of the most terrifying images that has been used by spokesmen for WHO, by the pharma industry and various beneficiaries of the current "swine flu" panic is that of the 1918 "Spanish Flu" which is said to have resulted in more deaths than all World War I. Was it really a flu? Broxmeyer is convinced as others that it wasn't. A Press Release, issued on August 19, 2008, by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), contains a striking finding and conclusion: The 20 to 40 million deaths worldwide from the great 1918 Influenza ("Flu") Pandemic were NOT due to "flu" or a virus, but to pneumonia caused by massive bacterial infection."4

It seems that - in conjunction with Bayer's intense advertising, and advice from government, medical authorities, and military - aspirin was the most likely culprit.

But the continuing myth of a virulent 1918 virus that killed millions has been the justification for the government pushing vaccines, worth billions to those invested in them and who, coincidentally fund the CDC and WHO.

Why does this matter in the context of the e.coli and government recommendations for radiating food? Because 1918 appears to have been the greatest corporate (pharmaceutical industry) catastrophe ever. The greatest loss of life from sickness, second only to the bubonic plague (treatable today) appears to be man-made, the threat not coming from nature but from lethal drugs and government pressure to use them. And practitioners who saved the lives of most who came to them in 1918 were never mentioned - they were homeopaths who avoided aspirin because they saw it for what it has proved to be, a toxic substance.

Today homeopaths (natural practitioners) are also avoiding vaccines as the CDC and government are pushing them for all they are worth ... based on a complete medical falsehood - the return of the virulent 1918 virus which killed millions. Such a dangerous virus never existed and the other pandemic scares are as empty but as invaluable for profit.

So, as people are told by a government whom they don't trust about money, war, homes, jobs, trade agreements, oil drilling, fracking, clean water, clean air, chemtrails, health, vaccines, etc. - a government closely tied to the pharmaceutical industry and nuclear industry and bankers - that this terrible e.coli has sprung out of nowhere and people have reason to be very afraid and the answer is to radiate fresh food.

Since this is the exact food human beings need to stay healthy, people might pause a little and think.

How wrong they got it during 1918. How silent they have been about the reality of 1918 since then. That falseness is basis of their scare-mongering around pandemics which are tied to not only their big plans for vaccines, but disturbing laws they put in place. Smothering the reality of 1918 and of what killed people and who saved them, allows pharma and their funded agency, the FDA, to be moving here and internationally to eliminate access to the natural substances that save lives and actually cure, and to continue imprisoning practitioners of natural medicine, the true heroes of 1918.

Such practitioners and doctors have condemned radiating food for a long time.

Who should people listen to?

The media tells us the e.coli is a great crisis. Is it a crisis caused by nature or by man? Media say nothing about its sudden unlikely appearance or who benefits. Yet the e.coli is undoubtedly a boon to those who have gain from fear and then from the destruction of health itself in the name of "food safety."

"The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, so what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes... They pull the strings... AND WE DANCE." ­ John Swinton, former chief-of-staff for the New York Times, in an address to fellow journalists.
Post a Comment

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...